Menu
VideoParliament
VideoParliament Irish politics in one place — download the app
Get app
VideoParliament
VideoParliament for Windows Get the desktop app — notifications about new speeches
Get app
Brian Stanley on Ukraine: Negotiations, Reform and Security

Brian Stanley on Ukraine: Negotiations, Reform and Security

Brian Stanley addresses how EU accession talks with Ukraine intersect with concerns about corruption, rule of law and European security during the aftermath of Russia's invasion. He stresses that opening the first negotiation cluster was geopolitically necessary while insisting candidate countries must meet membership criteria.

Ambassadorial perspective and firsthand experience


Brian Stanley recalls serving as ambassador in Ukraine and says corruption and governance issues were discussed routinely in EU heads of mission meetings. He uses that firsthand experience to frame why the first negotiation cluster - covering rule of law, democracy and anti-corruption - must be opened and closely examined.

Geopolitical rationale and EU consensus


Stanley argues that the decision to open accession negotiations under the Cypriot Presidency carries a significant geopolitical purpose that should not be undermined. He notes that EU capitals accepted the importance of that initial step for Ukraine's direction and for the protection of the continent.

Security and capability development for Europe


Beyond accession mechanics, Stanley highlights an urgent parallel task: strengthening European security and military capabilities. He says securing the Union, its values and territorial integrity is a key deliverable that must progress alongside reforms and merit-based accession criteria.

Brian Stanley — shot from remarks: Brian Stanley on Ukraine: Negotiations, Reform and Security (18.06.2026)

Reforms remain a condition


While acknowledging the geopolitical necessity of engagement, Stanley is clear that no member state advocates bypassing the common higher criteria. He affirms that all candidate countries must proceed on merit and that accession will depend on meeting required reforms.

We publish thousands of recordings to make Irish politics transparent and resistant to manipulation. Spotted an error? Report it — together we are building a reliable archive of Irish politics.

Tego samego dnia All speeches from this day →

Transcript
I'm the Context Ambassador of the EU Presidency and I think it's fair to say that the last four years with Russia's invasion of Ukraine has been the major issue in Europe in terms of security, in terms of military preparedness and all of that. How does your government see the situation regarding, because it's a very lively discussion, in fact in the last week there's been commentary by European leaders including Ireland in relation to Ukraine's membership, potential membership of the Union. But how does your government view the situation with Ukraine because, and I'm not an expert on it, but before the invasion there was systemic corruption by all accounts. There was, in terms of media freedom, there's questions there. In terms of, you know, we now have a fascist force, an openly declared fascist force that is now incorporated into the Ukrainian army. And in terms of their readiness for even advancing EU membership, and obviously this was a live issue during your six months in the Presidency, how does your government stand now on that? Because it's obviously going to be an issue for the Irish government here, or the Presidency, how to handle this. But it would appear, and maybe I'm at the wrong measure of this, that a lot of European capitals are taking quite a benign view of all of this, that it seems to be, there seems to be a little bit of a rush to incorporate Ukraine. I mean, Moldova's coming in, that's fine. But with Ukraine, I mean, there is a number of red flags in relation to the state of affairs generally within Ukraine before the invasion of Russia. How do you see that in terms of, you know, in terms of that playing out during the Irish Presidency? Thank you very much, Deputy. Let me just tell you that I was ambassador in Ukraine for five years, twenty days before the war, so I have first-hand experience of what you're saying about corruption. It was something that was discussed daily in the Homs meetings, in the heads of mission meetings of the European Union, so I quite know it very well. So the question is that we are not going to ask Cypriot Presidency to work very hard to open the first cluster of negotiation chapters of the accession of Ukraine to the European Union, because this cluster is a cluster that exactly deals with issues like that, rule of law, democracy, and anti-corruption measures. So this is actually the first stage, and this is what we are trying to examine now. Now, the opening of the negotiations with Ukraine has a significant, a huge significant geopolitical sense for the reasons we all know, so this should not be undermined. And all the capitals in the European Union have accepted the fact that opening the first cluster of negotiations is of huge importance for the direction this country should go and for the protection of the European continent. Now, I would reverse a little bit the question and say what has the Ukraine, what has the Ukraine war or the Russian aggression towards Ukraine taught us? Yes, one of the answers was the opening of the negotiations of Ukraine, the first cluster under the Cypriot Presidency, but one of the deliverables that we have to have, how do we secure Europe? And that's when the security that it was under autonomous Europe, and that was the chapter under our Presidency, and that's the chapter that I see in the Irish Presidency. Security of Europe has to be developed and capabilities have to advance in order to protect our European Union, its values, its territorial integrity. Could I put it this way? Is the move to defend Europe and to deal with the Ukrainian government on that basis, is that trumping and is that coming ahead of actually the fundamental reforms and challenges in relation to Ukraine being in a state to comply with the rules of EU membership? But I don't think that any member state says that Ukraine should not comply with the membership, the common higher criteria. Therefore, everybody will say that all candidate countries will proceed upon merit. I don't think that there is a question that we say, yes, because of geopolitical reasons, Ukraine should enter as it is now without reforms. So I don't think that the Presidency of Cyprus has ever said that. What we have said is because of the geopolitical necessity, we have opened, and we are very proud that we have done that, we have opened the first cluster of negotiations for accession with Ukraine. This is the one thing. And the other thing parallel to this is that we are trying to deliver a stronger military Europe in the sense of military capabilities so that we are stronger to defend our continent. Thank you.