Paul Murphy on AI: Jobs, Energy and Big Tech Control
Paul Murphy criticised the parliamentary debate on AI, arguing it reproduces big tech spin and overlooks risks to jobs, resources and the climate. He warned that expanding data centres and importing LNG could increase fossil fuel use and displace workers, and urged resistance to corporate capture.
Paul Murphy described the debate as "pretty depressing" and said many deputies had echoed big tech talking points. He singled out the new Minister for AI for only referencing climate action in the context of AI helping sustainability and contrasted that with claims that AI expansion will greatly increase power needs and be met by fossil fuels.
Murphy cited research saying 30% of Irish workers are in danger of being replaced by AI and noted the World Economic Forum estimate that 85 million workers will lose jobs to AI globally. He warned women and those in administrative and creative roles would be disproportionately affected and challenged the Taoiseach's claim that enabling data centres will protect workers.
He questioned where the massive demands of AI will be met, asking where rare earth minerals, water and energy will come from. Murphy argued the Irish Government appears to envisage filling new energy demand by importing LNG from America - a fuel he said could be "even dirtier than coal" - and criticised proposals that could dramatically increase fossil fuel use.
Murphy invoked the Luddites as a historical parallel, arguing they were skilled workers resisting technology implemented to impoverish communities and reduce autonomy. He called for less capture by big tech, more public scrutiny and for society - not corporations - to control how new technology is used.
Main criticisms
Paul Murphy described the debate as "pretty depressing" and said many deputies had echoed big tech talking points. He singled out the new Minister for AI for only referencing climate action in the context of AI helping sustainability and contrasted that with claims that AI expansion will greatly increase power needs and be met by fossil fuels.
Job losses and inequality
Murphy cited research saying 30% of Irish workers are in danger of being replaced by AI and noted the World Economic Forum estimate that 85 million workers will lose jobs to AI globally. He warned women and those in administrative and creative roles would be disproportionately affected and challenged the Taoiseach's claim that enabling data centres will protect workers.
Environmental and resource concerns
He questioned where the massive demands of AI will be met, asking where rare earth minerals, water and energy will come from. Murphy argued the Irish Government appears to envisage filling new energy demand by importing LNG from America - a fuel he said could be "even dirtier than coal" - and criticised proposals that could dramatically increase fossil fuel use.
Historical comparison and policy demands
Murphy invoked the Luddites as a historical parallel, arguing they were skilled workers resisting technology implemented to impoverish communities and reduce autonomy. He called for less capture by big tech, more public scrutiny and for society - not corporations - to control how new technology is used.
We publish thousands of recordings to make Irish politics transparent and resistant to manipulation. Spotted an error? Report it — together we are building a reliable archive of Irish politics.
Other speeches
Tego samego dnia All speeches from this day →
Danny Healy-Rae
Danny Healy-Rae urges action on rural water crisis
Michael Collins
Michael Collins urges state apology over Whitty Island disaster
Richard Boyd Barrett
Richard Boyd Barrett on Aircoach cuts and public transport
Ciarán Ahern
Ciarán Ahern warns AI energy use threatens climate goals
Rose Conway-Walsh
Rose Conway-Walsh urges government to build AI expertise
Mattie McGrath
Mattie McGrath supports maritime reform after coastal fatalities
Transcript
I have to say that it has been a pretty depressing debate so far with a few honourable exceptions. Most of the deputies have swallowed and then regurgitated the spin from big tech. I find it incredible that you have a speech from the new Minister for AI which only reference to climate change is about AI being used to help us address sustainability and climate action. No mention of the suggestion by many including Donald Trump that is going to result in a doubling of our power need and Trump envisages that that will be filled by coal. The Irish government clearly envisages that it will be filled by a fuel even dirtier than coal by importing LNG from America. What is AI going to do for workers? The Taoiseach claimed yesterday if we do not enable data centres to massively expand fossil fuel usage it will damage workers. But in many cases it will put them out of a job. The government's own research has found that 30% of Irish workers are in danger of being replaced by AI. Women and people in administrative and creative roles are disproportionately at risk. The World Economic Forum estimates that 85 million workers will lose their jobs to AI in the coming years. We need less of this capture by big tech and more cop on and asking some basic questions. Where are the massive amounts of rare earth minerals going to come from? Where is the water going to come from? Where is the energy going to come from? Is it worth crashing our planet throwing millions of people out of work for the sake of AI generated slop? Do we want crappy paraphrases from chat GPT like taking over the internet? Do we want uncanny valley videos of people with six hands walking down? Is that the way we want to spend our energy? Is that how we want to use our water? Do we want more far right content with AI generated fake videos fomenting hate? Is that what we want? And I think we need to look back in time actually to look at a previous movement that engaged with new technology and said yes we want technology but we want it for the benefit of people. We want the control of society not big corporations. I am reading a book at the moment about the Luddites and the Luddites must be probably the most maligned movement in history where literally if you look up a definition of the word Luddite it means someone who is opposed to technology. The Luddites were not opposed to technology they were skilled workers confronted with the implementation of new technology that was used to impoverish their communities to lower the quality of the products they were producing and to take away the autonomy that they had previously and to drive child labour. They started off not by breaking machines but by petitions to the king to the government that fell on deaf ears and then they were forced to resort to insurrectionary practices. They were ultimately crushed by massive state repression occupation thousands of thousands of soldiers but basically the Luddites were right and we could do with applying the lessons today when it comes to big tech.