Bríd Smith called for a Dáil debate on violence against women and the outcome of Natasha's case, urging the House to address the matter before the summer. She argued that the impending retirement of a judge could lift restraints on parliamentary discussion and pressed the Business Committee and government to schedule wider debate and consider sentencing issues.
Call for debate on Natasha's case
Bríd Smith told the Dáil the seriousness of violence against women and the findings in Natasha's case require parliamentary time. She said the judge involved is due to retire imminently and that retirement should lift the restraint that has limited discussion in the House.
Legal constraints and parliamentary limits
She acknowledged legal processes can limit debate on individual court cases while proceedings are ongoing, citing provisions about the role of the DPP and elapsed time. At the same time she said a broader debate on gender-based violence and a zero-tolerance strategy would be appropriate and could be taken up at the Business Committee.
Policy suggestions and sentencing guidance
Smith welcomed a proposal on suspended sentencing and suggested the Judicial Council and its sentencing guidelines could provide a vehicle to explore those ideas. She proposed that she and the minister reflect and engage with deputies on how best to consider suspended sentences and other reforms.
Scheduling, related debates and other business
The speaker noted a busy Dáil schedule, including several hours dedicated to other bills and proposed votes on matters such as the Migration Pact. She and other deputies also raised the Primetime Investigates programme on horses and the recent death of a long-serving deputy, which may affect members' availability for sittings.
Next steps and expectations
Smith urged the Business Committee and government to find time for a focused debate before the summer and said the Government would respond positively to requests for wider discussion on gender-based violence. She stressed the importance of distinguishing between debating an individual live court case and addressing systemic issues in the Dáil.
We publish thousands of recordings to make Irish politics transparent and resistant to manipulation. Spotted an error? Report it — together we are building a reliable archive of Irish politics.
I'm aware we're running out of time in this term in the Dáil, but the seriousness of what has happened in relation to violence against women and the findings in the outcome of Natasha's case, I think we have to find time to debate it. Tomorrow we've six and a half hours dedicated the afternoon to various bills. Tomorrow also, luckily for him, more than luckily for us, but the justice in the case will be retired. So the restraint that you quoted earlier on should be lifted from you, because it's very frustrating in this House not to be able to deal with issues and outcomes in the courts as serious as this one, and they are extraordinarily serious, and it is not the first time that this justice was involved in a similar occasion, nor will it be the last time that many justice will be involved, and I'm aware the councillor is obliged to shout at me, but I am looking for a debate on the issue, and the constraints will be lifted by tomorrow when the individual is retired. You are out of order. I often feel the business commission is one of the most important things around here. Thanks very much to members who have raised a number of issues. Deputy Batchik, thank you for raising the very serious issue in relation to gender-based violence. I fully understand and comprehend that women are exhausted, fed up, angry and frustrated. I think your suggestion in relation to the issue of suspended sentencing is has real merit. I think trying to find a vehicle to consider how best to explore that is likely to be the role of the Judicial Council in sentencing guidelines, but perhaps myself and the Minister could reflect and engage with you in relation to that as well. Deputy Murphy, I too was horrified by the Primetime Investigates programme in relation to horses, and I have no difficulty with a debate being scheduled. I don't think it was flagged at the Business Committee this week, but we are happy to try and arrange that. Deputy Smith, I do need to be very careful here, because the point I was making in relation to legal processes was not in relation to any individual judge, it was in relation to a section I quoted from the legislation which talks about the role of the DPP and the time period that elapses, and that is certainly not a constraint that is in any way, shape or form linked to a judge's retirement or otherwise. Deputy McGrath, on the Migration Pact, I am not sure you will ever be satisfied with how we decide to take this forward, but we did take a decision last week to give more time again to it this week. We gave a commitment as a government that every member of the Dáil who wished to speak on the Migration Pact would, of course, be provided with that, that there would not be a guillotine in that regard. We provided additional time for that to happen, I think that is today, and then we hope to bring that matter to a vote in the Dáil tomorrow. Deputy McLaughlin, thank you for raising that logical and fair question. We are hoping to have that vote tomorrow. We will work out the time with you, but probably after lunch. I should say Ken Corlow, a former colleague of many people in this House, Deputy Bernard Allen, a person who served with great distinction for 30 years, served my party with distinction, served the people of Cork with distinction, and the people of Ireland passed away. Obviously there will be a number of people, including myself, who will wish to attend that funeral tomorrow, but I would hope we could have that vote later in the afternoon. нужно vote for state government crowd for the Eeveanna to the Supreme Fifth Coalition, and in exchange for that vote. It happens all of the implications for the violence against women in this country, I think it's imperative that we have this before the summer. Whatever rules are imposed about don't say this, that or other about judges, we need to have the debate. Deputyということで theinagan Rяться Weddingbands, Chemistry alternately for students. I was very clearly saying, I say this not because I don't care I say it because I care. We cannot have a debate in this House on the individual case, where the legal proceedings areない. may not yet have concluded. But it's a different matter if this House would like to have a broader debate in relation to gender-based violence, zero tolerance strategy and the likes, and certainly that's something that could be raised at the Business Committee to which the Government would respond positively.
Thank you for downloading 🙏
If you publish this material on social media, we would be very grateful if you tagged VideoParliament. It helps us reach more people and keep building a transparent archive of Irish politics.
