Kathleen Funchion raises after-schools access and budget concerns
Kathleen Funchion questioned access to after-schools and expressed disappointment that the budget left the early years sector and parents feeling forgotten. She argued that HSE referral rules and parental fears of TUSLA are preventing some families from accessing sponsorship supports.
After-schools access and parental fear
Kathleen Funchion described a disconnect between official accounts and what families experience on the ground, saying many parents—especially those unemployed or stay-at-home—are having difficulty accessing after-schools. She warned that some parents will "run a mile" from seeking help if they think it will involve TUSLA, for fear of being labelled bad parents.
Sponsorship programme rules and HSE referrals
The minister acknowledged the scheme is new and that information has not reached everyone, and noted that under the new system the HSE can only refer children under fours, which excludes many children in after-schools. The minister also said TUSLA can act as a sponsor for any child up to the age of 17 and that TUSLA applies a range of criteria, including support for children connected to the child protection system from level two upward.
Funding pressures and service sustainability
Funchion flagged that some after-schools have closed for a variety of reasons and highlighted funding as a key issue for after-school providers. The minister pointed to sustainability funds as a resource intended to support services experiencing financial difficulty linked to the current situation.
Budget reaction from the early years sector
Funchion said workers, parents and providers in the early years and creche sector felt "totally forgotten about in the budget," noting anger and hurt among those trying to keep creche doors open. She emphasised that high childcare costs have cut many people out of the workforce while wages for sector staff remain low.
Ongoing review and next steps
The minister said he is open to review and further engagement, noting extensive discussions with Deputy Omuraku and others, and described an expert funding model review underway. That review is considering how to direct streams of funding to areas of disadvantage, with a DASH-type model among the issues being examined.
We publish thousands of recordings to make Irish politics transparent and resistant to manipulation. Spotted an error? Report it — together we are building a reliable archive of Irish politics.
I often think when we are in here that there is obviously a disconnect between what we actually hear and hear and what people experience on the ground, because the reason I raise this point is that a number of people, not only in my own constituency but throughout the country, have raised the difficulty that they are having access in after schools, particularly where parents are unemployed or they might be stay-at-home parents. They could possibly fall into a vulnerable category, not vulnerable enough maybe to come to the attention of TUSLA, and I think this can sometimes be where the breakdown is, because I know you mentioned the sponsorship programme, but under the new system, the HSE can only refer under fours, which obviously rules out the whole after schools situation, and a lot of people, if they think that they might have to go to TUSLA first for assistance or additional help, they will run a mile, because they are afraid of that system, and they are afraid that somehow they are going to be highlighted to be bad parents or something, when that totally might not be the case, but there is definitely a disconnect between what you are saying and what people are experiencing on the ground. Okay, Garmani, yeah, to Eric. Thanks, Ciancarla. Thanks, Deputy, and look, I have engaged quite extensively with your colleague, Deputy Omuraku, on this particular issue. I suppose this is a new scheme, and this is year one, and we're in the middle of a pandemic, so the manner of informing both the sponsorship bodies of their, I suppose, their obligations and of letting parents know about what's available, it hasn't worked like it should have, and look, I fully accept that, and that's why we've been engaging with the sponsorship bodies, particularly about what they can offer. And just as regards to TUSLA, there's a range, and TUSLA can be a sponsor for any child up to the age of 17, and there's a whole range of criteria that TUSLA can apply. And look, I take your point about, you know, some element of concern about engaging with TUSLA, but any child known or connected with the child protection system from level two onward, so not a high level of issues, just maybe something, some difficulties that that family has, that child can avail of the sponsorship arrangement. Deputy Minister, Deputy Function. Mr. Minister, are you saying that you're open to review or to take some kind of consultations or submissions, particularly in relation to this, because it is, you know, definitely coming up, but not just one or two people with the issue, like parents have contacted, I know, and I know we're in the COVID situation, but people have also, some after schools have closed, now that's for a variance of reasons, but there is definitely an issue around funding and after schools, and I would appreciate if you'd look at it. And the final point I want to raise, and it's not in fairness in relation to this question, but I just can't let it pass that we're a week after the budget, and the disappointment that the early years sector, those working in the sector, those trying to keep the creche doors open, and parents felt totally forgotten about in the budget. Now, I know you will say that you point to do a review, but really, there is so many people kind of cut out of the workforce due to the cost of childcare, and those working in the sector certainly aren't benefiting from the high fees. Because their wages are very low, and I really feel that there was a lot of anger and a lot of hurt from people who are providing the service, from people who are working, and from parents, they really did feel forgotten about in the budget, and I just want to take the opportunity to raise that with you. Thanks. Thanks Deputy, and look, I think I'll be able to address some of those in later questions from yourself and other deputies. I think, look, I'm always open to the review and to examining particularly new structures to make sure they operate as effectively as possible, and that's why, as I said, I've had extensive engagement with Deputy Omuraku and other deputies on this point. I do think a significant part of the issue is the newness of the scheme and the lack of information that's out there at the moment. But look, where you encounter services, and you mentioned services have closed. Obviously, we have the sustainability funds there, and that should be there to support those services if it's a sustainability issue caused by this particular issue. And finally, to say, as regards the expert funding model review, which is ongoing at the moment, one of the issues they are looking at is how do we fund, how do we direct streams of funding to areas of disadvantage, kind of a DASH type model for childcare, and that's part of their considerations. And I think going forward, that will be really important as well. Thank you, Minister. Thank you.
Thank you for downloading 🙏
If you publish this material on social media, we would be very grateful if you tagged VideoParliament. It helps us reach more people and keep building a transparent archive of Irish politics.