Paul Murphy: Are Deepfake Scams Threatening Our Democracy?
Paul Murphy questions whether AI-generated videos and scam adverts using people’s likenesses are being investigated or prosecuted, and warns they could undermine elections. He asks officials whether impersonation, misinformation and disinformation linked to financial scams and fake election messages have attracted criminal investigations.
Paul Murphy highlights a recent phenomenon in which prominent figures appear in videos endorsing dubious investments. He names examples used in parliament to illustrate the problem and asks whether publishers or creators have faced criminal prosecution for those scams.
Murphy raises the specific risk of AI-created impersonation ahead of elections, questioning whether producing a false video of a candidate urging a different vote could be a crime. He presses officials about which offences might apply, including impersonation and incitement to hatred, and requests clarity on investigations.
During the exchange Murphy refers to named broadcasters and public figures who have appeared in scam videos, and to AI-generated material involving a named candidate from the presidential campaign. He stresses the potential impact on local constituencies and election outcomes.
Officials respond that investigations into misinformation and disinformation have taken place and that specific complaints would be examined, but that prosecutions for impersonation or AI-generated election interference are not known to him. Murphy urges clearer guidance and confirmation of whether criminal inquiries are under way.
Allegations of fake adverts
Paul Murphy highlights a recent phenomenon in which prominent figures appear in videos endorsing dubious investments. He names examples used in parliament to illustrate the problem and asks whether publishers or creators have faced criminal prosecution for those scams.
Legal uncertainty on impersonation
Murphy raises the specific risk of AI-created impersonation ahead of elections, questioning whether producing a false video of a candidate urging a different vote could be a crime. He presses officials about which offences might apply, including impersonation and incitement to hatred, and requests clarity on investigations.
Examples cited in the debate
During the exchange Murphy refers to named broadcasters and public figures who have appeared in scam videos, and to AI-generated material involving a named candidate from the presidential campaign. He stresses the potential impact on local constituencies and election outcomes.
Next steps and complaints process
Officials respond that investigations into misinformation and disinformation have taken place and that specific complaints would be examined, but that prosecutions for impersonation or AI-generated election interference are not known to him. Murphy urges clearer guidance and confirmation of whether criminal inquiries are under way.
We publish thousands of recordings to make Irish politics transparent and resistant to manipulation. Spotted an error? Report it — together we are building a reliable archive of Irish politics.
Other speeches
Paul Murphy warns students penalised by flawed Leaving Cert oral exams
Paul Murphy decries 'breathtaking cynicism' in hospital handover
Paul Murphy accuses Brendan McDonagh of causing housing crisis
Paul Murphy demands referendum on neutrality, warns of NATO drift
Paul Murphy: Calls Three-Day Sick Leave 'Extremely Meagre'
Paul Murphy decries delays on statutory home care for older people
Tego samego dnia All speeches from this day →
Sharon Keogan
Sharon Keogan warns Ireland unprepared for energy shocks
Joe O'Reilly
Joe O'Reilly urges Family Resource House for Coot Hill
Conor D McGuinness
Conor D McGuinness Seeks Independent Oversight of ATSI Inspections
Danny Healy-Rae
Danny Healy-Rae praises Geartic areas and local All-Island wins
Conor D McGuinness
Conor D McGuinness
Conor D McGuinness: Warns on SFPA Risk Profiling Transparency
Transcript
Thanks a lot. To follow up on the point about the scams, I mean one of the sort of scams we've seen recently, they were very prevalent a couple of years ago, I haven't seen them in a while, but is prominent people, Ryan Tuberty, Neil Martin, Brother O'Gorman, Miriam O'Callaghan, Breed Smith, a video of them saying that, oh I were caught out, this thing you really need to invest in, and if only you knew about it, and so using people's likenesses to advertise a product that is a financial scam. I've seen there has been like private cases taken against publishers to bring this stuff down, have there been any criminal prosecutions or investigations taken in relation to any of these sort of scams? I'm not aware of any, but again I'm happy to confirm that and come back to you. Okay, related to that in terms of the question of kind of misinformation and disinformation, again have there been any guarded investigations in relation to this? Like you know I can imagine in terms of potentially very seriously impacting on our democracy, you can now, you could have a general election in a few years time and you can have, you know say in my constituency, you could have a video from me which seems exactly like me saying in this area you should vote number one for whoever, someone who's not me, and that's the best way to get a left government, and could have a very serious impact on the outcome of elections. Like something like that, is that a crime, what's it a crime under, and have there been investigations in relation to things like that? So you're talking about sort of an impersonation type scenario? Yeah. So I'm not aware of any prosecutions in relation to that, but we certainly have had investigations around misinformation, disinformation, where real people if you like have you know put information online, you know encouraging people to commit crime in certain scenarios in the city. And what about stuff that like impacts on the running of our democracy? What potentially are you, you know what's the potential charge that you can use there if people are spreading information you know in a very malicious way? Again I think in the presidential election there was some AI generated stuff of Catherine Connolly, like presumably this is a crime, but what's it a crime under? Well you have things like incitement to hatred, depending on what the content is, and I suppose every situation has to be examined, you know depending on what the material is that we're looking at, but I suppose the incitement to hatred is probably one of the main ones that comes to mind. But what if I mean, what if there is no incitement to hatred, there's no group target, it's just let's say it's a video of me saying the best thing to do is not to vote for me vote for someone else, is that a crime to create such a video, a false video of me? If you make a complaint we'll investigate it. You don't know currently what legislation potentially that's a crime under? Potentially under impersonation. Yeah there could be impersonation offences there, but again we'd have to see what the actual situation was, we'd have to talk to you, get a statement of complaint from you, and then see where we can take it from there. Thanks a lot. Thanks Paul.