Carol Nolan: Mercosur Will Flood Irish Farms, She Warns
Carol Nolan addressed the Minister about the European Council conclusions of 19 March and warned that the Commission's push for Mercosur provisional application from 1 May will damage Irish agriculture and rural livelihoods. She argued that EU priorities on competitiveness, net zero and external spending are out of step with the needs of farmers, small businesses and households in Ireland.
Carol Nolan set out the council's One Europe, One Market agenda adopted on 19 March and contrasted its stated aims with the European Commission's continued advance of the Mercosur trade agreement toward provisional application from 1 May. She emphasised that Ireland voted against the deal because it will expose family farms to lower-standard beef, sugar and other agricultural imports from South America.
Nolan warned that sidelining thousands of farmers who brought evidence-based concerns erodes public trust and contradicts the Council's stated aim of strengthening democratic resilience. She also highlighted the scale of Ireland's financial commitments to Ukraine and questioned whether those international expenditures are being balanced against urgent domestic pressures from health to rural infrastructure.
On climate policy, Nolan criticised the ideological drive to rapid decarbonisation, saying the suspension of the carbon tax delays but does not remove the structural costs borne by households, farms and businesses. She called for scrutiny of the true costs of net zero policies and for protecting Ireland's farming sector and taxpayers when international commitments are considered.
Council conclusions and Mercosur
Carol Nolan set out the council's One Europe, One Market agenda adopted on 19 March and contrasted its stated aims with the European Commission's continued advance of the Mercosur trade agreement toward provisional application from 1 May. She emphasised that Ireland voted against the deal because it will expose family farms to lower-standard beef, sugar and other agricultural imports from South America.
Democracy, trust and domestic costs
Nolan warned that sidelining thousands of farmers who brought evidence-based concerns erodes public trust and contradicts the Council's stated aim of strengthening democratic resilience. She also highlighted the scale of Ireland's financial commitments to Ukraine and questioned whether those international expenditures are being balanced against urgent domestic pressures from health to rural infrastructure.
Net zero, carbon tax and living costs
On climate policy, Nolan criticised the ideological drive to rapid decarbonisation, saying the suspension of the carbon tax delays but does not remove the structural costs borne by households, farms and businesses. She called for scrutiny of the true costs of net zero policies and for protecting Ireland's farming sector and taxpayers when international commitments are considered.
We publish thousands of recordings to make Irish politics transparent and resistant to manipulation. Spotted an error? Report it — together we are building a reliable archive of Irish politics.
Other speeches
Tego samego dnia All speeches from this day →
Brendan Smith
Brendan Smith urgens cash support for farmers
Jennifer Whitmore
Jennifer Whitmore: Energy Crisis Is a Social Justice Crisis
Michael Fitzmaurice
Michael Fitzmaurice warns BIS change will 'open the gate'
Victor Boyhan
Victor Boyhan: Unregulated, State-Funded Care Exposed
Paul McAuliffe
Paul McAuliffe: Europe must treat energy shock as an emergency
Conor D McGuinness
Conor D McGuinness: Demands Data Safeguards and Road Safety Action
Transcript
Minister, on the 19th of March of this year, the European Council adopted conclusions that included the formal launch of the One Europe, One Market agenda. According to the official document, this initiative is designed to boost EU competitiveness, strategic autonomy, economic security and prosperity, while preserving the European social model. The priorities set out are ambitious, deepening the four freedoms, removing internal barriers, simplifying rules and improving the recognition of professional qualifications, and strengthening consumer and product safeguards. On energy, the conclusions call for an accelerated transition to renewables and low carbon sources to reduce price volatility. These objectives may appear constructive, yet for Irish agriculture, the reality on the ground tells a completely different story. While the Council speaks of competitiveness and simplification, the European Commission continues to advance the Mercosur trade agreement towards provisional application from the 1st of May. Ireland voted against this deal in the Council, precisely because it will expose our family farms to a flood of lower standard beef, sugar and agricultural imports from South America. This directly threatens the viability of farming enterprises in my own county of Offaly, and indeed across the Midlands and this state. It undermines the very producers the EU claims to support through its single market strategy. This disconnect is particularly striking given that the Council's emphasis on strengthening Europe's democratic resilience. The conclusions rightly highlight the need to protect democratic discourse and counter disinformation. However, when thousands of Irish and European farmers raise legitimate evidence-based concerns about the impact of Mercosur on food production, rural economies and environmental standards, these concerns are set aside. The institutions proceed regardless. Such an approach erodes public trust and contradicts the very principles of citizen engagement and council that the Council claims to uphold. A similar pattern is evident in the Council's reaffirmation of unwavering support for Ukraine, including continued financial, economic and military assistance. Ireland has already committed hundreds of millions of euros in taxpayers' funds to this effort. We must acknowledge the scale of this expenditure at a time when domestic pressures here, from hospital waiting lists to rural infrastructure deficits, remain acute. Irish families and businesses are entitled to expect that their elected representatives will balance international commitments with the immediate needs of its own citizens. I know from speaking to many agricultural contractors, they still need continuous support and they are constantly contributing to our economy and indeed as taxpayers they should get fair play, as should our small businesses and our haulage companies who will also need continued support going forward. Finally, the Council's call for an accelerated low-carbon transition must be examined also in the light of recent domestic developments. The Government has announced a suspension or partial suspension of the carbon tax in response to public fury over rising fuel costs. I have consistently opposed the carbon tax. The EU-driven net zero agenda, with its binding 2030 targets and emissions transfer mechanisms, continues to impose significant additional costs on households, on farms and on enterprises through higher fuel, heating and production expenses. The carbon tax suspension does not alter Ireland's commitment to that agenda, it merely delays the full impact while the structural costs remain. This illustrates the broader tension of an ideological commitment to rapid decarbonisation that is not logical at all or fair or balanced and this in practice delivers higher living costs without delivering the energy security or competitiveness that the Council seeks. The one Europe, one market agenda, while presented as a pathway to prosperity, must be judged by its effects on Irish agriculture, on the families bearing the cost of the energy transition and on the allocation of taxpayers' public resources. Ireland's national interest requires that we defend our farming sector, scrutinise the true cost of net zero policies and ensure that international spending does not come at the expense or detriment of our own domestic priorities.