Richard Boyd Barrett: Govt Serving Landlords, Fueling Homelessness
Richard Boyd Barrett accuses the government of prioritising landlords and investors over solutions to the housing crisis, arguing recent rent resets and market-level increases have worsened homelessness and evictions. He details how changes to rent law and grounds for eviction are producing predictable, harmful outcomes that benefit property owners.
Main allegation: Richard Boyd Barrett argues the government has enacted policies that reset rents to market levels, a change he says has been an 'absolute disaster.' He cites a rise in evictions, including on the contested ground of alleged overcrowding, as direct consequences of those policy choices.
Policy mechanics: The speech explains how allowing rent increases to market levels has created incentives for landlords to push tenants out-through sale notices or claims of overcrowding-so they can raise rents and profit from a worsening housing market. Boyd Barrett names the main beneficiaries as small and medium private landlords who own multiple properties.
Human impact: The speaker highlights the human cost: record levels of homelessness, families and children traumatised by eviction, and long-term damage to vulnerable households. He frames the situation as both predictable and shameful, arguing the government should have foreseen these outcomes.
Implications: Boyd Barrett warns that without policy change the crisis will deepen, transferring wealth to property owners while worsening social harm. The video records a direct political challenge to government choices on housing, rents and tenant protections.
Main allegation: Richard Boyd Barrett argues the government has enacted policies that reset rents to market levels, a change he says has been an 'absolute disaster.' He cites a rise in evictions, including on the contested ground of alleged overcrowding, as direct consequences of those policy choices.
Policy mechanics: The speech explains how allowing rent increases to market levels has created incentives for landlords to push tenants out-through sale notices or claims of overcrowding-so they can raise rents and profit from a worsening housing market. Boyd Barrett names the main beneficiaries as small and medium private landlords who own multiple properties.
Human impact: The speaker highlights the human cost: record levels of homelessness, families and children traumatised by eviction, and long-term damage to vulnerable households. He frames the situation as both predictable and shameful, arguing the government should have foreseen these outcomes.
Implications: Boyd Barrett warns that without policy change the crisis will deepen, transferring wealth to property owners while worsening social harm. The video records a direct political challenge to government choices on housing, rents and tenant protections.
We publish thousands of recordings to make Irish politics transparent and resistant to manipulation. Spotted an error? Report it — together we are building a reliable archive of Irish politics.
Other speeches
Richard Boyd Barrett Condemns Government Inaction on Palestine
Richard Boyd Barrett: Demands Ring's End Upgrade after Sewage Spills
Richard Boyd Barrett warns biodiversity loss fuels pandemics
Richard Boyd Barrett: Demands probe into Cherrywood affordable housing
Richard Boyd Barrett Warns Public Will Overpay for 'Affordable' Homes
Richard Boyd Barrett attacks housing crisis and developer profits
Tego samego dnia All speeches from this day →
Danny Healy-Rae
Danny Healy-Rae: Release vacant homes - incentivise, don't coerce
Lynn Boylan
Lynn Boylan: AI or houses? The price of prioritising big tech
Lynn Boylan
Lynn Boylan: EU silence is undermining the United Nations
Mary Lou McDonald
Mary Lou McDonald: RTE scandal exposes culture of privilege
Ivana Bacik
Ivana Bacik: Rent reforms sparked eviction tsunami
Rose Conway-Walsh
Rose Conway-Walsh demands passport offices for Belfast and Derry
Transcript
It's difficult to escape the conclusion that the government don't want to solve the housing crisis and that they are serving the interests of people who profit from the housing crisis and the worse it gets the more those people profit. Why do I say that? Well, I mean the consequence of the changes around the the rents and resetting markets at market levels, allowing rent increases up to market levels, have been an absolute disaster. One of the things, for example, that was allowed but has now started to happen in my experience, as well as people being evicted on grounds of sale, which of course has been happening on a massive scale, it's the major reason people get evicted, but is people now, and I warned this was going to happen when the legislation came in, people are being evicted on the grounds that they're overcrowded. Now that's a really sick development in an already disastrous housing crisis, record levels of homelessness, record levels of eviction, that landlords are evicting people in order to get up to the market level on the grounds that their tenants are overcrowded because those tenants maybe have another child or there's too many kids in a bedroom or whatever. That is now a ground to evict people and landlords are evicting people on that basis and I'm having to deal with them. It's disgraceful but it was an entirely predictable consequence of what you did and the government knew, they could not but know, that the consequence of what you did with allowing the reset of market rents on the basis of market rents was going to make a bad and already dire situation worse. But there are beneficiaries from this and they are precisely the, I think it's 50,000 or so people who own between three and ten properties, another few thousand who own between 10 and 20 and a few hundred who own hundreds of properties. These people are making an absolute fortune and the worst the housing crisis is, the more there are homeless people, the more desperate people are, the more valuable their property assets are. The more they can charge, the more profit they make and it is difficult to conclude that other than that that's the interest that the government are serving and it's absolutely shameful that that is the case but I can't see any other explanation for what you're doing when we're actually seeing an acceleration of the numbers of people being homeless and the children being traumatized by that, families being traumatized by it, serious lasting damage being done to children and families who are particularly badly hit by this homelessness and eviction crisis so you should be ashamed of yourselves.