Michael McNamara: Backs Higher Gambling Tax, Seeks EU Clarification
Michael McNamara, MEP, spoke in the European Parliament on a proposed EU gambling tax, welcoming the debate and expressing support for higher levies to tackle gambling addiction. He asked the Commissioner to clarify whether any EU tax would be additional to or replace existing national levies.
Michael McNamara opens by welcoming the debate and reminds the House that parts of Ireland he represents already apply a 2% levy on bets, including online bets. He states he has no objection to increasing taxation on gambling, arguing that taxing harmful activities is consistent public policy.
McNamara highlights the growing problem of gambling addiction, especially among young people, and notes testimonies from sports figures about the damage caused. He frames higher gambling levies as a tool to address social harm and protect vulnerable citizens.
The MEP stresses one central question: will a proposed EU gambling tax be applied in addition to existing national levies or would it replace them. He requests clear confirmation from the Commissioner, saying he would oppose any measure that undermines national tax powers.
McNamara reiterates a guiding principle of fiscal policy: tax things that are harmful and consider reducing taxes on things that are beneficial. In principle he supports heavy taxation of the gambling industry to account for the social damage it causes.
Summary of remarks
Michael McNamara opens by welcoming the debate and reminds the House that parts of Ireland he represents already apply a 2% levy on bets, including online bets. He states he has no objection to increasing taxation on gambling, arguing that taxing harmful activities is consistent public policy.
Harm and social consequences
McNamara highlights the growing problem of gambling addiction, especially among young people, and notes testimonies from sports figures about the damage caused. He frames higher gambling levies as a tool to address social harm and protect vulnerable citizens.
National vs EU taxation
The MEP stresses one central question: will a proposed EU gambling tax be applied in addition to existing national levies or would it replace them. He requests clear confirmation from the Commissioner, saying he would oppose any measure that undermines national tax powers.
Policy principle
McNamara reiterates a guiding principle of fiscal policy: tax things that are harmful and consider reducing taxes on things that are beneficial. In principle he supports heavy taxation of the gambling industry to account for the social damage it causes.
We publish thousands of recordings to make Irish politics transparent and resistant to manipulation. Spotted an error? Report it — together we are building a reliable archive of Irish politics.
Other speeches
Tego samego dnia All speeches from this day →
Joanna Byrne
Joanna Byrne: Demands answers over RTE salary misclassification
John McGuinness
John McGuinness: NAMA ignored families, demands answers
Brian Brennan
Brian Brennan: Is RTE Fit for Purpose After Scandals?
Emer Currie
Emer Currie: Calls for a Second Garda College in Blanchardstown
Michael Collins
Michael Collins: Defends Irish Neutrality, Demands Triple Lock Vote
Brian Stanley
Brian Stanley: Halt the Defence Amendment Bill, Defend Neutrality
Transcript
Thank you very much, Madam Vice President. I very much welcome this debate. Ireland, part of which I represent in this House, already has a gambling tax of 2% levy on all bets laid in Ireland and 2% levy equally on online bets in Ireland. I have no problem with increasing that tax. I mean, clearly, gambling is a major issue. It's an issue that's destroying particularly young lives as we see more and more young people becoming addicted to gambling. We know sports stars, etc, telling their stories. And I mean, I think we should follow the policy of taxing things that are bad and seeking to reduce taxes on things that are good. So I have no problem with it whatsoever. My only question would be, if this EU tax comes in, will that be as well as national taxes or will it somehow be instead of national taxes, which I would have a problem with. So I would welcome clarification from the Commissioner on that. But in principle, I have no problem whatsoever with taxing the gambling industry and taxing them heavily for the damage that they're causing in society.