Rose Conway-Walsh: Demands Independence for Irish AI Office
Rose Conway-Walsh addresses concerns about the rushed timetable and the independence of the proposed Irish AI office during debate on AI legislation. She argues for clearer safeguards on ministerial powers and for Amendment 16 to ensure board diversity and expertise.
Concern over rushed scrutiny
Rose Conway-Walsh opens by warning that the short time available to scrutinise critical AI legislation risks inadequate oversight. She highlights pressure from multiple pieces of legislation at this time of year and calls for more time for proper parliamentary scrutiny.
Committee roles and responsibilities
She welcomes the Enterprise Committee's pre-legislative scrutiny being taken on board, but stresses that the dedicated AI Committee must have a clear role. Conway-Walsh warns of potential overlaps and the need to define responsibilities so the legislation can be improved through proper committee input.
Independence and ministerial powers
Conway-Walsh emphasises that the independence of the Irish AI office is central to the bill's credibility. While the government states the office is independent, she says parts of the draft legislation raise questions about ministerial powers that could undermine that independence.
Board composition and Amendment 16
Speaking to Amendment 16, she argues the seven-member board must reflect the society it will regulate. Conway-Walsh lists areas that must be represented: AI expertise, human rights, equality and law, trade unions and workers' rights, consumer protection and civil society engagement. Without those voices, she says, the board cannot deliver the oversight and regulation required.
We publish thousands of recordings to make Irish politics transparent and resistant to manipulation. Spotted an error? Report it — together we are building a reliable archive of Irish politics.
Minister, I too want to say, and I've said to the Ministers, you know yourself how concerned I am about the short space of time we've had to really scrutinise something as important as this. Now I take from your, the time is just too short, don't push up with amendments, as well as all the other legislation at this time of the year that piles on together. Now I do take from your from your opening statement that you will be taking on board the Enterprise Committee pre-ledge scrutiny report, and that's a positive thing, but I absolutely, I agree with Deputy Gibney in the sense that you have a dedicated AI Committee. That dedicated AI Committee must have a role, and should have a role, in making this the best possible legislation that we can have. So there is the difficulty there between splitting the areas of authority and the areas of responsibility between those committees, and so above any time we would have needed extra time to be able to deal with this bill in the way that we absolutely needed it to be. The independence of the AI office, the Irish AI office, is critical to all of this and to everything that comes after it, and I note while you say in the opening statement that it is independent, there are things within the legislation here that would prompt me to think, to question that independence in the sense, particularly in relation to the ministerial powers in that. So you have, I suppose you have a lot to do to convince us in terms of the independence of it, but in the main, the amendment, I speak to amendment 16 that I have put there, because I absolutely believe that the expertise and the knowledge of new members that will compromise the board must reflect the sections of society for which they will be regulating. That's why I have explicitly included the areas of AI, of human rights, of equality and law, trade unions and workers' rights, consumer protection and civil society engagement. So across all proposed seven members of the new board, these are areas that should be represented. So if those voices aren't represented on the board, then I cannot see how there can be an independence and an expertise there in terms of the oversight and the regulation that we need on it. That's all I'd say for this point. Thank you.
Thank you for downloading 🙏
If you publish this material on social media, we would be very grateful if you tagged VideoParliament. It helps us reach more people and keep building a transparent archive of Irish politics.
