Menu
VideoParliament
VideoParliament Irish politics in one place — download the app
Get app
VideoParliament
VideoParliament for Windows Get the desktop app — notifications about new speeches
Get app
Danny Healy-Rae backs tighter vetting, faster paths for workers

Danny Healy-Rae backs tighter vetting, faster paths for workers

Danny Healy-Rae spoke on a motion addressing changes to the international protection system, praising the minister's actions and supporting tighter vetting and returns for those without identification. He urged faster pathways for workers, backed financial tests for family reunification and welcomed powers to revoke residence permits for security or serious crime reasons.

Support for the minister's approach


He thanked the minister for taking the issue "by the scruff of the neck," saying removals of people not entitled to be here represent a change from previous years and that he will support the motion.

Vetting and returns in rural communities


He referenced an instance on Muckras Road in Kanaanay where 70 to 80 asylum seekers were placed alongside elderly women without apparent vetting, arguing that arrivals without passports or identification cannot be properly vetted and should be returned to their last point of departure.

Family reunification and financial rules


He described the proposed change that those granted international protection may only avail of family reunification when financially self-sufficient and able to provide for those they wish to bring here. He noted the scheme will be implemented within a planned 12-month period to develop systems for eligibility assessment, secure data sharing and payment processing.

Security measures and residence-permit revocation


He welcomed the introduction of powers to revoke or refuse a residence permit where a refugee is found to be a danger to the security of the state or involved in serious crime, saying such powers should be provided for in law and used to return offenders to their countries of origin.

Danny Healy-Rae — frame from speech: Danny Healy-Rae backs tighter vetting, faster paths for workers (28.01.2026)

Citizenship residency and fast-tracking workers


He highlighted the proposal to align the residency requirement for naturalisation for those granted international protection with the standard five-year rule rather than three years. He called on the minister to review and fast-track pathways for people who are working and whom employers need to retain after investing in their training.

We publish thousands of recordings to make Irish politics transparent and resistant to manipulation. Spotted an error? Report it — together we are building a reliable archive of Irish politics.

Tego samego dnia All speeches from this day →

Transcript
Deputy Hillary. I'd like to get the opportunity to talk on this very important motion here this evening. And first of all, I want to thank Minister Jim O'Callaghan for taking this issue by the scruff of the neck because we have seen since he has come into office, since he took over this role, he already has put people on the plane back to the countries that they came from if they weren't entitled to be here. That hasn't been done over the last number of years with previous ministers, and I'm grateful for that. We have to differentiate here the differences in the people that are coming here. There are people that are coming here with visas, work visas, and they are very welcome, very welcome to work here. And many of them are badly needed, and they have trouble in getting permanent visas, or getting their family, wives, or children brought over here. And reputable employers are raising concerns about that. They have men that they have trained, and people that they have trained, and people that have various skills in the areas that they're working, those people are needed. We appreciate those people, and we need them, and we need the system to help them to progress, and to stay here when they're working like this, and they're needed, as I said. The other ones that we can do without are the people that come here with no passport, and seem to arrive here, and demand everything. And we know what it was like for people in the Muckras Road in Kanaanay, when there were 70 or 80 asylum seekers put into a house alongside elderly women in that road, and they weren't vetted, or nobody knew where they were from, or why they were there. And that's very wrong, because veting is seriously important, and if they have no passports or no identification, they can't be vetted, and they should be sent back exactly to where they came from in the first place. The changes to the international protection system will ensure that anyone who's been granted asylum here in Ireland is only permitted to avail of family reunification when they are financially self-sufficient, and can provide for those they wish to bring here. I see where we're also introducing power to revoke or refuse a residence permit for a refugee, in circumstances where they are found to be a danger to the security of the state, or have been convicted in involvement in serious crime. Whilst these situations may be rare, I think there's a lot of them at times, it is important that these polls are provided for in law, and that these people are sent back to the country of their origin. The scheme will be implemented within a planned 12-month period, along for the development of systems and resources to assess eligibility, share data securely and collect and process payments. While not all international protection applicants are working, many are, and it makes sense, and it's only right for these people who are earning income and paying tax to also make a contribution to the state for their accommodation costs. Other EU member states operate those systems already. You see, there are two rules, then, for applying for citizenship. You're proposing to update the rules around how people qualify for citizenship. At present, if you want to apply for citizenship by naturalisation, you must have been resident here for five years. The rule for people granted international protection is different, in that they only need to be here for three years. Now, what you're saying now is that you're going to update that, so that it could be five years, they have to be resident here before they can apply for citizens here. Again, Minister, I say if there's any way that we can fast-track the pathway for people to come here or to stay here who are working, that's very, very, very important. As I said to you, many employers are having difficulty in sourcing staff, and when they have them, maybe on a time limit or whatever it is, when that time is up, they're harder to go back and they're not able to get an extinction, and I'm asking you to review that and ensure that people who want to work, and who are working here and have been working here, that they are facilitated in their quest to remain here. And at the same time, those people who come here without any identification, no vetting or not prepared to say where they came from or how they came to be here, those people must be sent back by returning a plane to wherever they came from last, whichever airport they got on last. So, look, I will be supporting this. It looks like that we will have some plan or some form of order to follow now, because we didn't over the last number of years, many people were hot in rural communities, when they see people landing that they were not sure where they were from, they didn't have any vetting, and they were worried about them, especially women who were walking the walks that they used to always walk in the evenings or whatever, they had to stop. That's not right, Minister. This is our country, and all women and all men must be protected, and children as well, protected from whoever new is coming in. If me or you or anyone else here inside this chamber is going for a job, we have to be vetted, and vetted several times. So, the same thing has to be the order for people coming in here. They have to be vetted. It's the most important thing. We have to understand and be sure where they have come from. And, Minister, continue on your work, because you will find a massive improvement to what we had in the last governments, and we look forward to support you. Now you have to have a traditional finest of heaven, and you are traveling all those who come from college, and you should be doncsajitsu, and you should be standing in San Francisco andちょ darüber. So you're restaurant in San Francisco. There's a touring population, and that they will be downtown. Of course, you're the sheriff's full, and there's a hearing on the double scene. It's a 34. These eugenics Status are back on the perfect focused 최고 tool and the two consolidations. If you have us discovered a newnutpy顔 layer, there's a good idea that James Hilbert Mai was in range of basics.