Paul Murphy Blames Government Policies for Child Homelessness Crisis
Paul Murphy spoke in the Dáil about child homelessness and housing policy, arguing the crisis is created by government choices that favour landlords and developers. He accused the government of a right-wing neoliberal approach and criticised rent increases and the treatment of vulnerable families.
Main argument
Paul Murphy stated the rise in child homelessness is not a natural disaster but an "unnatural disaster" produced by government policy. He argued that framing the problem as an unavoidable tragedy obscures responsibility and the policy choices that have driven the crisis.
Winners and losers
He identified landlords and developers as the beneficiaries of those policies, citing an almost tripling of landlords receiving rent since 2009 and corporate landlords paying nothing in tax. He claimed the top 50 construction companies increased sales to 8.4 billion, up 25% in the last year, and said those gains are linked to worsening homelessness.
Criticism of ministers' response
Murphy attacked the government's public responses as out of touch, noting the minister described a 13 euro-per-week rent increase for council tenants as "modest" and a 3 euro increase for others as negligible. He said such remarks show a lack of understanding of the real costs to low-income households, calling the attitude callous.
Case study of a family affected
He put a human face on the crisis with a case handled in his office: a young mother forced out of an overcrowded family home, sharing rooms with children and siblings, who then had to go to a homeless centre to be officially recognised as homeless. Murphy highlighted the mental health impact, family breakdown and the indefinite separation from community and a child's school as direct consequences of current policy.
We publish thousands of recordings to make Irish politics transparent and resistant to manipulation. Spotted an error? Report it — together we are building a reliable archive of Irish politics.
I find it very hard to listen to the government's excuses about the very worst aspects of child homelessness again. We hear them so regularly at this stage. The entire presentation is to present this as a terrible natural disaster that we have. It's terrible. We're all working very hard to try and sort it out and so on. And it obscures the reality that this is a very unnatural disaster. It's a disaster that is created by the government's policies and for the children who are in homelessness and for the families who are in homelessness and the effect that they will have on them for the rest of their lives, there's a flip side of the coin, which is those who benefit from the government's policies. That's almost the one in three landlords on the government benches and it's the developers who benefit. There are winners and losers to the government's right-wing neoliberal approach to the housing crisis. The more than almost tripling of landlords receiving rent since 2009, the corporate landlords paying nothing in tax, the top 50 construction companies increasing their sales up to 8.4 billion, 25% up last year. They're the winners and the direct consequence of their winning and the policies designed for them to win is the horrendous crisis of child homelessness and homelessness generally. How can they sleep at night? I think it's because they're utterly out of touch with the reality of ordinary people's lives and they don't care. I thought it was revealed very callously and very brutally by the answer that the tarnish they gave earlier on to leaders' questions when he referred to the increase for council tenants in rent as being modest. So an increase of 13 euros a week, 13 euros a week for old-aid pensioners on low and fixed incomes, Simon Coveney thought was modest. Or an increase of 3 euros a week for everybody else, you clearly think that's nothing. That's the cost of a latte to Simon Coveney. But the reality is for those families, that's the cost of school lunches for almost a week for their children. They simply don't care, they're completely out of touch. I want to put a human face on this with a case that I've been dealing with this week in my office. A young mother who was living with her family completely overcrowded. She was sharing a room with her children. Her younger 11-year-old brother was sharing a room with her parents. The situation became worse after she became homeless, after family tensions meant she had to leave her family home. The costs of that crisis are immense. Mental health distress, familial breakdown. That left the mother and her children in a very precarious situation. They were not originally considered homeless by the council because they had lived at a family home. They then had to go to a homeless centre to be considered homeless. Meaning staying indefinitely away from their community and their child's school. That's the real cost of your policies. You're responsible. You're also responsible for the winners and the profits that they're making. Lologists need to intervene to lead You're 고�pit, is not responsible for yourself. Okay, Bucky, Bucky. DAD ... ...
Thank you for downloading 🙏
If you publish this material on social media, we would be very grateful if you tagged VideoParliament. It helps us reach more people and keep building a transparent archive of Irish politics.
