Menu
VideoParliament
VideoParliament Irish politics in one place — download the app
Get app
VideoParliament
VideoParliament for Windows Get the desktop app — notifications about new speeches
Get app
Paul Murphy: UN Report Exposes Empty Rhetoric at Glasgow

Paul Murphy: UN Report Exposes Empty Rhetoric at Glasgow

Paul Murphy criticised world leaders' rhetoric at Glasgow, citing the UN Emissions Gap Report and warning that current national pledges would reduce emissions by only 7.5% by 2030 versus the 55% needed to aim for 1.5 degrees. He attacked the handling of methane targets, saying Ireland endorsed a 30% global cut but intended only a 10% domestic reduction for agribusiness, and warned the planet is on course for 2.7 degrees of warming.

UN Emissions Gap Report findings


The speaker highlighted the UN Emissions Gap Report's assessment that nationally determined contributions to date would only cut emissions by 7.5% by 2030, far short of the 55% reduction benchmark discussed for keeping warming close to 1.5 degrees. He warned that current commitments leave the world on a trajectory to about 2.7 degrees - a result he described as absolutely disastrous.

Methane target and agribusiness carve-out


He criticised the apparent contradiction in committing to a global methane reduction target of 30% by 2030 while exempting domestic agribusiness with a much weaker 10% cut. He described this approach as epitomising the widening gap between soaring rhetoric and disastrous inaction on climate policy.

Concern about rhetoric versus action


The speaker argued that signing up to global targets while narrowing domestic obligations reveals a failure to address the climate crisis. He said such small-print exceptions undermine genuine commitment and fuel public scepticism about political willingness to meet targets necessary to limit warming.

Paul Murphy — clip from remarks: Paul Murphy: UN Report Exposes Empty Rhetoric at Glasgow (03.11.2021)

Debate tone and responses in the chamber


A responding deputy acknowledged that a 2.7 degree trajectory would be catastrophic and defended collective diplomatic efforts like COP26 and the Paris accords as having positive elements. That speaker criticised what they called persistent cynicism from opponents, arguing that stoking cynicism would not advance climate action and accusing some interventions of pursuing ideological goals rather than constructive progress.

We publish thousands of recordings to make Irish politics transparent and resistant to manipulation. Spotted an error? Report it — together we are building a reliable archive of Irish politics.

Tego samego dnia All speeches from this day →

Transcript
The UN Emissions Gap Report gives lie to the empty rhetoric of world leaders in Glasgow. In analysing the new nationally determined contributions, they outline that what has been agreed so far by various states would only mean reducing carbon emissions by 7.5 per cent by 2030, as opposed to the 55 per cent level which is agreed to be needed in the EU. It is needed to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees. We are currently on a trajectory to 2.7 degrees, which would be absolutely disastrous. Teachta, the continuation of the widening of the gap between the soaring rhetoric and the disastrous inaction was epitomised by your approach to the methane target. I think it is quite incredible to say we are Ireland's commitment to climate action and the small print is commitment to climate action by someone else. We are happy to sign up to global targets for 30 per cent cuts in methane by 2030, which is absolutely the minimum that is necessary. But then to literally turn around the next day and say to agribusiness in this country, oh, no, don't worry, we don't mean you, we're only going to do 10 per cent. Doesn't it reveal the absolute failure of your sort of politics to address the climate crisis? In terms of the Deputy Murphy's points, again, Deputy Barry raised similar issues, but I accept 2.7 degrees is catastrophic. That's why we need to do action. But all I get here is an attempt, I mean, my view is your perspective is that you want to take down the world order as it is to solve climate action. That's what you want to do. I don't know. I think Ireland is not a capitalist state in your pure definition. No, it's not. The state intervention in Irish economic activity is enormous. But the view anyway, you're not going to solve climate change by trying to take it down every day of every week when governments meeting together collectively is a positive thing. I mean, there are positives in COP26, there are positives in Paris. People elect different leaders who do different things to pull everybody together in itself as an achievement. And to try and get progress, we should try and will it on. Instead, what you were doing, Deputy, is stoking cynicism day in and day out, which I do not think will advance climate change one iota. You just see this as another theatre to advance your fundamentalism and your ideological perspective. Thank you.