Paul Murphy warns CETA could block nationalisation of Corib
Paul Murphy asked the Taoiseach to consider recent judgments on CETA and warned the treaty could allow corporations to challenge nationalisation of the Corib gas field. He argued a private investor tribunal under CETA might overturn democratically made energy or climate policy decisions.
CETA and investor-state dispute concerns
Paul Murphy said the Costello case judgments raise implications for how Ireland can respond to the energy and climate crises under CETA. He warned that the investor court system in the treaty creates a private tribunal accessible only to corporations which could bring claims against the State.
Risk to Corib nationalisation
Murphy said Corib is currently entirely Canadian owned and that a future Irish government choosing to nationalise Corib could face a CETA tribunal alleging expropriation. He warned that, if such a tribunal prevailed, Irish courts would be bound to enforce the tribunal’s award.
Taoiseach's response on investment and jobs
The Taoiseach replied that CETA has benefited many companies and jobs since 2017 and pointed to Enterprise Ireland clients exporting to Canada. The Taoiseach said acting in bad faith toward investors would damage foreign direct investment and create uncertainty that could cost jobs, and suggested legislative and European-level developments can address issues.
Judges' observations cited in debate
Murphy quoted Mr Justice Charlton that the CETA Joint Committee can act supra-legislatively and override the Oireachtas’s lawmaking power. He also cited Ms Justice Dunne noting the almost automatic enforceability of CETA awards and saying that is why ratification by the people is necessary, given the parallel jurisdiction created by the treaty.
We publish thousands of recordings to make Irish politics transparent and resistant to manipulation. Spotted an error? Report it — together we are building a reliable archive of Irish politics.
I wonder if the Taoiseach has had time yet to read and consider the judgements in the case in relation to CETA brought by Patrick Costello. I think CETA has a lot of implications for how we respond to the energy crisis, for example. I would hope that a future government in Ireland will take the decision to nationalise the Corib gas field. At the moment, Corib is entirely Canadian owned. If we have signed up to the investor court system as part of CETA, at that moment, they would be able to take the Irish state to a CETA tribunal. That's a private tribunal that's separate from the regular court system. And if they won their case, presumably alleging direct expropriation in contradiction of the CETA agreement, well then, the Irish courts would be bound to enforce their judgment, would have no choice in the matter. So you get a situation where a democratically elected Irish government makes a decision to do a certain policy in response to the energy crisis, in response to the climate crisis, and that is overturned by a private tribunal which is only accessible by corporations. So I want to just quote from a couple of the judgments. Mr Justice Charlton said, CETA sets up a supra-legislative body through the Joint Committee with unlimited powers of interpretation of a vague set of principles within the treaty. The Joint Committee makes laws. These override the exclusive lawmaking power of the Oireachtas. That process is in no way democratic. And to quote Ms Justice Dunne, she says that, if I can find it, she says, she says effectively that, she says, okay, of particular significance is the almost automatic enforceability of CETA awards. To my mind, that is why it is necessary to have CETA ratified by the people, given that it cuts down the jurisdiction of the courts and involves the creation of a parallel jurisdiction whose awards are enforceable in this jurisdiction. Do you agree, Tisha? Deputy Murphy raised the judgments on CETA. I will examine those in detail. There's quite a number of judges made their opinions known. I would say that I'm sure you would agree that CETA has been very beneficial to many, many companies in Ireland and to many jobs. It's been an operational since 2017 and about 400 companies that are client companies in Enterprise Ireland are involved in exporting and they're in the market in Canada. A lot of our, you know, produce is exported to Canada. Canada is a country that we have good relationships with in terms of the international rules-based order. And all of that needs to be said, because it rarely gets said by those who take an opposite view to CETA. And it does need to be said. You raised the issue of nationalisation of the coral and what could potentially happen. I think we have to act in good faith with companies who invest in Ireland. I think your approach would destroy foreign direct investment in Ireland. Because if a future government just willfully nationalised someone who decided to invest in Ireland, because governments here don't have the way we ought to speculate on fossil fuels. Now, will we be in the future? And where companies invest here, they need to have that security. That we have an international rules-based system here. That there are no sudden shocks. That it's not the case you can invest in Ireland and suddenly the government takes a turn and say, we're going to nationalise everything you have. That leads to a banana republic very quickly. And I think you would actually undermine foreign direct investment. Maybe that's something that you want, because maybe you don't agree with multinationals coming into Ireland. Maybe you don't agree with democracy. That's a position. No, but that's a position. And you're entitled to that position through the Chair. But I think I'd need to point out that the consequence of what you're suggesting, I think would be quite damaging to jobs in Ireland. And a lot of workers would lose their jobs, because a lot of people wouldn't invest in such a climate or such an environment, if that indeed was the case. And I think that's a fair point I'm making, because it would create a grave uncertainty. And as I say, I will be, it's my view, the advice we've received so far is that it can be resolved through legislation. And there will be, there has been already decisions taken at the European court level in terms of a dilution of the investor courts and so on. But I'll read the judgments and we'll give this assessment and we will examine that.
Thank you for downloading 🙏
If you publish this material on social media, we would be very grateful if you tagged VideoParliament. It helps us reach more people and keep building a transparent archive of Irish politics.
